Beatles

You are currently browsing articles tagged Beatles.

Yes, I'm still on about the Beatles. The remastered stereo box set is so cool, I might just write a blog post about each album. Or maybe a post for every two albums. I haven't quite decided yet.

So, let's see how much I have to say about A Hard Day's Night, the first album the Beatles recorded on four-track equipment. It's also the first album to contain exclusively Beatle-penned songs and the only album in the entire catalog to contain nothing but Lennon-McCartney compositions. There are no covers, and no songs written by George or Ringo.

The album is the soundtrack for the movie of the same name, or at least half of it is. When originally released, the first side of the LP contained the seven songs that were included in the movie, and the second side contained songs that Lennon and McCartney had written with the movie in mind, but were never actually included in the film.

Let me just say right off the top that putting in A Hard Day's Night after listening to Please Please Me and With the Beatles is a bit like watching the middle part of The Wizard of Oz, where it switches from black and white to color. The depth of the mixes here is leaps and bounds above those of the first two albums. I know some people still prefer the mono mixes of all the albums that were released that way, but this stereo mix of A Hard Day's Night is, to my ears, bloody awesome. Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , ,

Last time around I prattled on at length about the packaging of The Beatles Stereo Box Set. I think I might have even gotten a bit of drool on my keyboard, but it seems to be working okay nonetheless.

This time around I'm going to start talking about the remastered music itself. The set I have is in stereo, but there's also a mono box set—called The Beatles in Mono—that includes the ten albums that were released in mono in the UK (Yellow Submarine, Abbey Road, and Let it Be were never given a separate mono mix) along with Mono Masters, which includes the mono mixes of the singles and EP tracks that were not included on the albums.

Why all the fuss? What's the big deal about mono? Isn't stereo better? Well, you might think so, but remember, back in the early sixties, stereo was a relatively new phenomenon. Mono was still the preferred format, and stereo mixes of LPs were usually only purchased by true hi-fi enthusiasts. Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , , , ,

Thanks to the arrival of Christmas and some not-so-subtle hinting on my part over the last three months, I've been visited by the Beatles. Or, should I say, I've been revisiting the Beatles.

The Beatles Stereo Box Set (the big black box) was under my tree on the twenty-fifth, and I couldn't have been more excited. As any of you who read my previous post on the Beatles will know, I'm a huge fan, and to own the entire album catalog plus the singles in remastered digital format is pretty much the motherlode.

I'm still kvelling.

I'm taking my time with this one. I've listened to the first three albums so far, and I've been just sitting back and taking them in, not doing anything else at the same time (which is a challenge, as I've been listening to them on my computer). I don't want to gulp it all down at once, and I don't want them to just act as background music. I want to delve deeply into the experience. Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , ,

So… Is there anyone out there who doesn't know someone who wants either the Beatles version of Rock Band or the Beatles remastered box set for Christmas this year? I know I've got my eye (and ear) on the stereo box set (if there are any still to be had) and if I had a PS3 or XBox360, I would definitely want the game as well. Alas, I have but a modest PS2, so no Beatles Rock Band for me.

But that's okay, because I don't play video games that much anyway.

But I digress.

I'm fairly tickled by the fact that both The Beatles: Rock Band and The Beatles Remastered were released on September 9th, 2009 (or 09/09/09). It would have been even cooler if the actual time of the release had been 09:09:09 on that date as well, but given that the world has at least twenty-four time zones (some sources claim as many as thirty-one), trying to release a game and a set of CDs at a specific time would have been problematic at best. Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,